This is Bill307's edit. The closest catagory it fits right now would be User maps - final, although technically it was used in one of those shitty leagues that we shouldn't count as justification for a "Pro maps" status.

no...It's a classic. Everyone knows LT, 2.4 is just the best of all versions, but still LT, which is a blizzard map. <BR><I>modified by panschk </I>

I'd agree... perhaps "mod by bill" if anything.

hah rep uploaded on lt ;=)

Ah, good old LT, still one of the simplest and unbalanced maps out there, and the most played of course. But, who cares? we love LT, don't we?

"modified"

the GAMEI version >>>>>>>>>>>> this one

i dont like the changes at 12... LT lives from its asymetries and so it shall stay ^^

2.4 rocks. 1-2 Years ago I had the same point of view as you have, changing LT (esp. the 1000 different versions) seemed just wrong to me. But now that I care more about gameplay and balancing than a few years ago, where it all was about uniqueness for me, I think it was neccesary to fix LT. Why should controlling the cliff at 9 mean killing two expos, while it only affects one on all other positions. Why should you need 3 hatch expo at 12 and nowhere else?
It's still not perfect, but balancing wise better solutions like "the lost shrine" are too much changes imo.

I would not play any other LT version anymore

btw I changed it to "classic". Calling LT a user map is just wrong...

you need to redo your categories imo. what's the point of "classic?" u should have a category called "semi-pro" for maps that have been used in some leagues, tourneys, decent stuff like that but not the good korea leagues (pro).

LT deserves more to be "semi-pro" than "classic" which includes blizz maps no one should really play anymore.

then u could rename "classic" to "blizzard" or whatever.

u could also seperate pro further by having "current pro" and "retired pro"

in short, i hate "classic" idea. and we need "semipro" to differentiate between user-final maps that have gotten play and those that haven't.

how can anyone say this map is unbalanced when it has the most even stats on pgt?

LT 2.4 is easily the best version. But if somone wanted this map perfectly balanced it would still need alot of work.
If zerg is at the 9 oclock main, cant zerg fast expo easier?
Before, Its min only was tankable from the highground.
In current versions, 3 + 6 still have min onlies that can be seiged by tanks on opposite side of walls, 12 + 6 dont have that.

still love the map tho

it is POSITIONAL imbalanced, not race-wise

I like the positional imbalance (except when i get 12/3 -_-) It makes for variance in the games instead of each base being exactly the same amount of space away from each other.

Edit watch the rep i just uploaded, its funny <BR><I>modified by decafchicken</I>

it favors some strats and limits some. you can do dt drop on terran quite good on 9-6 while you cannot on 9-12. you can go FE being zerg with 2 hatch on 9o'clock in ZvT, while you can't even go 3-hatch if you're on 12 and terran on 3...

that's fucked up, nothing more -.-